Facing a child abuse or child neglect investigation in Tampa Bay is an emotionally overwhelming and legally complex ordeal with life-altering stakes. Even a single allegation can trigger swift legal action, jeopardizing your freedom, parental rights, career, and reputation. Law enforcement and child protective services (CPS) take these accusations seriously, often launching intrusive investigations before hearing your side of the story. In reality, these workers are human just like the rest of us. In such critical moments, having an aggressive, strategic, and experienced legal defense team is essential to protecting your rights, challenging the allegations, and safeguarding your future.
The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., led by Tampa attorney Rocky Brancato, who has over 25-years of experience defending child abuse claims, is uniquely qualified to defend you against these allegations and intervene to minimize the chances of an investigation escalating into criminal charges. Rocky Brancato’s extensive background includes serving in an elite legal unit specializing in child abuse, sex crimes, and homicide cases—giving him a deep understanding of the complexities and high stakes involved. Rocky is also the past second-in-command of the largest criminal defense firm in the Tampa Bay Area, the Hillsborough Couty Public Defender’s office. In that capacity, Rocky mentored hundreds of attorneys on child abuse cases and helped guide favorable results on behalf of many of the office’s clients over the years.
Rocky’s expertise in forensic evidence, police interrogation tactics, and prosecutorial strategies allows him to expose weaknesses in the case against you, challenge questionable evidence, and aggressively advocate for your rights. Whether you are under investigation or facing formal charges, you need a battle-tested attorney who will relentlessly defend your freedom, reputation, and future. Tampa Attorney Rocky Brancato is also an expert in handling child sexual abuse cases, should you or a loved one be accused of that type of abuse.
Once a child abuse allegation is made, investigations proceed swiftly, often blindsiding parents and caregivers. Law enforcement and the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) frequently operate under the presumption that abuse has occurred, sometimes without considering the full context. Parents who seek medical attention for their child—perhaps for an accidental injury—can suddenly find themselves under scrutiny rather than receiving the care they expected. Medical professionals, including members of the Child Protection Team, may hastily conclude that abuse has occurred without thoroughly evaluating medical history, family dynamics, or the circumstances surrounding the injury.
Your first indication of an investigation may come in the form of an unexpected visit from a detective, social worker, or medical professional questioning you about your child. By the time you fully grasp the severity of the situation, the consequences may already be in motion—threatening your parental rights, reputation, and freedom. A single accusation can thrust you into two simultaneous legal battles:
However, criminal charges are not always inevitable. With the right legal strategy, you may be able to prevent false or exaggerated claims from escalating. Attorney Rocky Brancato understands how these cases unfold and knows how to intervene early, protect you during an investigation, and challenge weak or misleading evidence before it gains traction. By guiding you through interrogations, handling interactions with investigators, and scrutinizing questionable claims, he works tirelessly to prevent an investigation from turning into a criminal case.
If you are facing allegations, time is not on your side. The sooner you seek legal representation, the greater your chances of avoiding severe consequences. Rocky Brancato and The Brancato Law Firm are ready to defend you, protect your rights, and fight for your future.
Medical Investigation Leads to Dismissal of Aggravated Child Abuse Case – A father was accused of aggravated child abuse after his daughter suffered an injured pancreas. The Child Protection Team alleged that the injury resulted from intentional blunt force trauma. Rocky Brancato gathered medical records from birth to the incident and retained a forensic pathologist who determined the injury was due to a congenital (meaning present since birth) choledochal cyst. The prosecutor dismissed the charges entirely.
Grandmother Cleared of Aggravated Child Abuse & Murder Charges – A grandmother faced first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse charges after her granddaughter drowned in a bathtub. Medical experts initially claimed the child had suffered blunt force trauma. Rocky’s investigation revealed that the liver injury resulted from CPR efforts made by first responders in their attempt to revive the child. As a result, the murder and aggravated child abuse charges were dropped, and the grandmother received probation for child neglect.
Aggravated Child Abuse Reduced to Misdemeanor – A young father was accused of severely injuring his baby. Following his arrest, he was hospitalized for a serious condition impairing his cognitive functioning. Rocky obtained medical records proving the client suffered from Toxoplasmosis, a brain infection affecting his ability to control his actions. The charge was reduced to a misdemeanor, and the client received probation.
Diversion Secured for Mother in THC Candy Case – A young mother faced charges after her toddler accidentally consumed THC-infused candy she had left within reach, leading to the child’s hospitalization. With no prior criminal record, she was eligible for an alternative resolution. Attorney Rocky Brancato successfully advocated for her to enter a diversion program, ensuring that upon completion, the State Attorney’s Office would dismiss the charges, allowing her to move forward without a conviction.
If you are under investigation or facing child abuse charges, securing experienced legal representation immediately is critical. These cases are aggressively pursued by law enforcement and child protective services. Anything you say—to investigators, doctors, teachers, or social workers—can and will be used against you. Even innocent explanations or statements made in good faith can be misinterpreted, taken out of context, or manipulated to fit a preconceived narrative of abuse.
Without a strong legal advocate, you risk being steamrolled by a system that sometimes prioritizes accusations over facts. A skilled defense attorney will protect your rights, scrutinize the evidence, challenge biased investigations, and ensure your side of the story is heard. Your future, reputation, and freedom are on the line—don’t face these allegations alone. Put Rocky in your corner!
Delaying legal representation can have devastating consequences. Investigations can be long, complex, and filled with procedural missteps that may harm your case if not handled correctly from the outset.
A striking example of the dangers of wrongful accusations can be seen in the Netflix documentary Take Care of Maya, which chronicles the story of a family whose medical concerns were tragically misinterpreted. Mismanagement by medical professionals and authorities led to wrongful accusations that tore the family apart, resulting in years of legal battles. Ultimately, a $261 million verdict was awarded to the family, underscoring the importance of taking swift and strategic legal action.
This case illustrates how wrongful allegations—especially in high-stakes situations—can spiral out of control if not met with immediate and aggressive legal defense. By securing experienced legal counsel early, you can mitigate potential damage, avoid critical mistakes, and build a strong defense from the beginning.
If you are facing wrongful allegations, don’t wait. Contact The Brancato Law Firm today to protect your future, reputation, and peace of mind.
Many parents believe that if they are innocent, they should simply cooperate with investigators. While cooperation is important, speaking without legal representation can lead to devastating misunderstandings. A medical emergency can rapidly turn into an interrogation, and anything a parent says—or doesn’t say—may be used against them.
A skilled Tampa attorney like Rocky Brancato will ensure that your rights are protected from the start. If you are being questioned in connection with a child’s medical emergency:
Child abuse investigations must be conducted with fairness and an open mind. If you or a loved one is facing allegations, seek legal counsel immediately. Put Rocky Brancato in your corner and take control of your defense today.
Wrongful child abuse allegations can have devastating consequences for families, often arising from misunderstandings, misdiagnoses, or false claims. These accusations may lead to legal battles, loss of custody, and irreparable damage to reputations. Understanding the most common causes of false child abuse claims is essential for building a strong defense.
False accusations of child abuse can lead to life-altering consequences, including arrest, loss of custody, and irreparable damage to one’s reputation. Given the gravity of such allegations, securing a knowledgeable and skilled defense attorney is crucial to achieving a favorable outcome. An experienced Tampa attorney like Rocky Brancato of the Brancato Law Firm, P.A. can implement various legal strategies, including:
A strong defense begins with scrutinizing the prosecution’s evidence, including medical reports, witness statements, and forensic findings. A skilled Tampa defense attorney can identify inconsistencies, misinterpretations of medical symptoms, or manipulated witness statements that cast doubt on the allegations.
False accusations often stem from ulterior motives, such as contentious custody battles or personal vendettas. A thorough Tampa defense attorney will investigate the accuser’s background to uncover biases or incentives for making false claims, such as financial disputes or previous false allegations.
Medical and psychological experts can differentiate between abuse-related injuries and symptoms caused by medical conditions or accidents. Expert testimony can also challenge forensic evidence, providing the court with a scientific explanation that refutes the allegations.
Ensuring due process is critical in defending against child abuse allegations. An experienced Tampa defense attorney like Rocky Brancato will monitor law enforcement and child protection agencies to prevent improper evidence handling, unfair questioning, or unlawful detention. Suppressing improperly obtained evidence can be pivotal in strengthening the defense.
When a child is brought into the emergency room unresponsive or showing concerning symptoms, every moment matters. The immediate assumption is that something serious has occurred, and medical professionals act swiftly to stabilize the child. However, alongside these life-saving efforts, another process often begins—one that can have long-lasting legal and emotional consequences for families.
Law enforcement and DCF Investigators are frequently called in cases where there is no clear explanation for the child’s condition. Special Victims Unit (SVU) detectives and child abuse investigators handle hundreds of cases each year, and their job is to determine whether abuse or neglect played a role in the emergency. This is where timelines become crucial—and where confirmation bias can cloud judgment. The timeline of who was with the child prior to the injury or illness may be the main or only piece of evidence in your case. A case built on circumstantial evidence requires an attorney skilled in challenging its validity.
Confirmation bias is a psychological phenomenon where individuals give more weight to information that supports their preconceived beliefs while disregarding evidence that contradicts them. In the context of child abuse investigations, this bias can result in investigators prematurely concluding that a caregiver has harmed the child—even when medical explanations exist. Unfortunately, this mentality sometimes starts at training.
From the moment an investigation begins, detectives and CPS caseworkers start constructing a timeline of events leading up to the emergency call. They will interview parents, caregivers, doctors, and anyone else who may have had contact with the child. If only one parent or caregiver was home at the time, they may quickly become the primary suspect.
This approach can be problematic. While child abuse cases are real and devastating, medical conditions such as metabolic disorders, undiagnosed illnesses, or accidental injuries can also cause symptoms that resemble abuse. Unfortunately, once an investigator begins to suspect abuse, every piece of information gathered can be interpreted through that lens. A well-meaning parent’s nervousness may be seen as deception. A lack of immediate answers may be viewed as evasion.
In serious child abuse investigations, the lead medical professional is often a doctor or nurse practitioner affiliated with the Child Protection Team (CPT). In Tampa, this medical professional is a key player at the CPT, which operates out of Mary Lee’s House, a centralized facility dedicated to evaluating and treating abused and neglected children. This setup, while a valuable community resource intended to safeguard vulnerable children, can sometimes lead to devastating consequences when medical conclusions are hastily drawn or influenced by cognitive bias.
Once the Child Protection Team doctor suspects abuse, a powerful domino effect can be set into motion. Other medical professionals at the hospital will often defer to the CPT doctor’s assessment, aligning their own evaluations accordingly. This medical consensus—whether accurate or flawed—will then be relayed to child protective investigators and law enforcement officers, who will, in turn, view the case through the lens of abuse rather than objectivity. Their reports, their questioning, and their overall perception of you as a parent or guardian will be significantly shaped by this initial medical determination.
Once this perception takes hold, the legal system can become overwhelmingly adversarial. The Child Protection Team doctor’s opinion will be presented to the Child Dependency Court judge and the Criminal Court judge (if there is one at the early stages), reinforcing a presumption of guilt before you’ve had the opportunity to properly defend yourself. From that point forward, it may feel as though the entire system is stacked against you—and in many ways, it may be. Without experienced legal representation, you risk being swept up in a process that moves swiftly toward child removal and, in severe cases, termination of your parental rights.
Forensic interviewers at the Children’s Advocacy Center (CAC) of the Children’s Justice Center, also known as Mary Lee’s House, play a crucial role in child abuse investigations. These professionals undergo specialized training to conduct interviews in a neutral, non-suggestive manner, ensuring that children can share their experiences in their own words.
Unlike untrained individuals who might unintentionally lead a child by suggesting possible events, forensic interviewers use open-ended questions to gather information without introducing bias. These interviews are video recorded, allowing law enforcement, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and medical professionals to review exactly what was said. Additionally, forensic interviewers wear an earpiece, enabling a multidisciplinary team—which may include police officers, child protective investigators, and medical experts—to provide input in real-time, ensuring the most effective and accurate questioning. This team may sit behind a one-way mirror so they can observe and hear the interaction as it occurs.
The Risk of Contaminated Testimony – A major issue in child abuse investigations arises before a child even reaches the CAC. Well-meaning but untrained individuals—including coparents, teachers, foster care providers, and investigators—may speak with the child first, potentially contaminating their testimony. These early conversations can introduce confirmation bias, where a child is unintentionally led to adopt a suggested narrative. Even subtle encouragement or repeated questioning can cause a child to believe and later affirm an event that may not have occurred.
Unfortunately, once an inaccurate narrative takes hold, it can be difficult to correct—even when a forensic interview later follows the proper protocols. By the time the child provides a recorded statement, their perception of events may already be influenced, leading to unreliable testimony.
How an Experienced Tampa Attorney Can Help – If you or a loved one is facing allegations involving a child’s statement, having an experienced defense attorney like Rocky Brancato is essential. With over 25 years of legal experience, Rocky Brancato knows how to thoroughly investigate the timeline of a child’s questioning, from the first discussion of the allegations through the forensic interview and beyond. This includes analyzing whether improper questioning took place and identifying any signs of coaching or suggestive techniques that may have compromised the child’s statement.
Additionally, when deposing the child, Attorney Brancato carefully evaluates whether outside influences such as parental coaching or leading questions before court proceedings—have affected their testimony. By meticulously dissecting the investigative process, he ensures that his clients’ rights are protected and that only reliable, uncontaminated evidence is considered.
In Florida, a parent has the legal right to assert reasonable or non-excessive corporal punishment as an affirmative defense against charges related to child abuse or child endangerment. This principle was established in the case Raford v. State, 828 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 2002), which recognized that parents may use corporal punishment, such as spanking, as part of their discipline strategy, provided the force used is not excessive.
The defense also extends to individuals who stand in loco parentis, meaning a person who assumes the role and responsibilities of a parent, even if they are not the biological parent. In these situations, the person acting in the place of a parent can assert the same defense when administering corporal punishment.
While the law permits corporal punishment, it sets limits on what constitutes acceptable conduct. Generally, reasonable corporal punishment would involve actions like a typical spanking, which is not intended to cause lasting harm or injury to the child, including mental injury. However, spankings that result in significant bruises or welts could potentially lead to criminal charges, though this would not automatically constitute felony child abuse. For felony child abuse to apply, the beating must involve more severe injuries that result in permanent disability or disfigurement.
In cases like King v. State, 903 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), Florida courts clarified that corporal punishment resulting in significant bruising may not meet the threshold for felony abuse. However, the child’s welfare can still be jeopardized, and in some instances, such conduct may lead to charges of contributing to the dependency of a child, which is a first-degree misdemeanor.
Ultimately, the use of corporal punishment in Florida is a legal gray area. While the law allows parental discipline, there are important limitations on the degree of force used. Parents and others acting in loco parentis should carefully consider whether their actions might go beyond what the law recognizes as reasonable and avoid causing any lasting harm that could lead to legal consequences.
When defending a client against aggravated child abuse charges, one of the first and most critical steps is gathering all available medical records for the child in question. An experienced criminal defense attorney in Tampa, particularly in cases involving serious allegations such as aggravated child abuse, will need to obtain a comprehensive set of medical records, ideally from birth. This extensive review helps to rule out any potential medical causes for the child’s condition that may be mistaken for abuse, such as birth injuries or undiagnosed medical conditions.
The process of obtaining these records can be time-consuming, meticulous and costly. It often requires the attorney to track down records from multiple hospitals, doctors’ offices, and specialists who may have treated the child over the years. Since these records are pivotal in establishing whether the child’s injuries or condition could have resulted from a medical issue rather than abuse, every detail matters.
To help organize and analyze this massive amount of information, the defense attorney may hire a nurse consultant to create a detailed timeline of the child’s medical history. This timeline helps pinpoint any significant events, procedures, or treatments that could suggest that the injuries sustained were not caused by abuse but rather by an unfortunate medical condition, such as a traumatic birth with forceps or a genetic disorder.
Once the records are compiled and organized, the next step is having one or more experienced medical doctors review the documentation. These medical professionals can provide expert testimony to clarify whether the child’s injuries or health issues could reasonably be explained by a medical condition rather than the alleged abuse. In some cases, these doctors may be required to testify in court, and their expert opinion can be instrumental in either refuting the charges or providing reasonable doubt.
Additionally, the defense attorney may need to schedule depositions for multiple medical experts, which can be a lengthy and costly process. Since doctors often train in one city or hospital and then move to another location after completing their residency, this may require the attorney to travel to different states or cities to depose each medical expert involved. These logistical hurdles, while demanding, are essential to thoroughly vetting every potential angle of the case.
Overall, the process of gathering and analyzing medical records in a criminal defense case involving aggravated child abuse is a critical, yet complex, task. It requires coordination with medical professionals, attention to detail, and the ability to uncover crucial medical evidence that may provide an alternative explanation for the child’s injuries. For a criminal defense attorney, this can be one of the most important steps in building a solid defense and ensuring the best possible outcome for their client.
Florida courts have established that not every instance of parental negligence or poor judgment amounts to criminal child neglect. Several appellate decisions illustrate the boundaries of what does not constitute neglect under Florida law.
Leaving a Child Home Alone Does Not Automatically Constitute Neglect – In Bernard v. State, 769 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2000), the defendant left her seven-year-old child at home alone to avoid making the child walk with her to pick up a younger sibling. The defendant remained in contact by phone, checking on the child’s well-being. The appellate court determined that while this may not have been the ideal decision, it did not rise to the level of criminal child neglect under Florida law. The ruling underscored that leaving a child unattended, without more, is insufficient to constitute a criminal offense.
Lack of Dental Care Insufficient for Criminal Neglect – In Weeks v. State, 832 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), the defendant was convicted of child neglect based on allegations that they failed to secure dental care for their child. However, the appellate court overturned the conviction, finding that the state had not provided competent evidence to demonstrate that the lack of dental treatment would likely result in serious injury. This case highlights that while neglecting a child’s healthcare needs may reflect poor parenting, it does not automatically meet the legal threshold for criminal neglect unless it poses a substantial risk of serious harm.
Failure to Recognize Child’s Serious Illness Does Not Constitute Willful Neglect – In Ristau v. State, 201 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), the defendant left their sick child with a babysitter. Although the decision may have been negligent, the court found no evidence that the defendant was aware of the severity of the child’s condition or that they willfully disregarded the child’s health needs. The ruling emphasized that criminal child neglect requires more than simple negligence—it must involve a knowing or willful failure to provide care in circumstances where serious harm is likely.
Poor Living Conditions Must Pose a Substantial Risk of Serious Harm – In Arnold v. State, (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), the state charged the defendant with child neglect based on the conditions of a trailer where a nine-year-old child lived. The prosecution pointed to hazards such as a knife on the floor, exposed nails in plywood, exposed electrical wiring, and unsanitary conditions. However, the appellate court ruled that these factors, while concerning, did not automatically equate to child neglect without evidence that they posed a serious risk of physical or mental injury. The court noted that:
This case reinforces that substandard living conditions alone are insufficient to support a child neglect conviction unless there is clear evidence that the environment creates a direct and substantial risk of serious harm.
These cases illustrate that while child neglect laws exist to protect children from harm, criminal liability requires more than mere parental misjudgment, negligence, or poverty—the state must prove a willful or reckless disregard for the child’s well-being that is likely to result in serious injury.
In cases involving child abuse, abandonment, or neglect, the legal protections that typically shield confidential communications do not apply. Under Florida law, privileged communications—such as those between spouses, or between a doctor, therapist, or other medical professional and their patient—are generally protected from disclosure. However, these privileges are specifically overridden when child abuse, abandonment, or neglect is suspected or known.
Florida Statutes, Section 39.204 expressly removes these privileges in child welfare cases, ensuring that critical information related to a child’s well-being is not withheld due to confidentiality concerns. This means that a spouse, doctor, or therapist may be legally required to disclose information about suspected child abuse or neglect, even if that information was obtained in confidence.
Courts have upheld this principle, reinforcing that public policy prioritizes the protection of children over maintaining certain legal privileges. In Hill v. State, 846 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), the court affirmed that the need to report and investigate child abuse allegations supersedes the confidentiality typically afforded by privilege laws. This legal stance ensures that mandatory reporters—including medical professionals, mental health counselors, and even family members in some instances—cannot refuse to testify or provide evidence regarding suspected abuse or neglect.
As a result, individuals who would otherwise be protected by these privileges must comply with reporting requirements and may be called upon to provide testimony in legal proceedings related to child welfare. This statutory exception underscores Florida’s strong commitment to protecting vulnerable children and preventing harm through timely intervention.
Years ago, Tampa attorney Rocky Brancato mentored a young lawyer handling their first aggravated child abuse case. The attorney was struck by the testimony of a Child Protection Team (CPT) doctor, who asserted with “reasonable medical certainty” that the child’s injuries were caused by abuse. But where was the actual science behind this claim?
Research revealed that CPT testimony originated from medical professionals making educated guesses—hypotheses presented in court as established medical conclusions. The first doctor to do so became the “expert,” passing down these untested theories to successive generations of courtroom witnesses. However, unlike true scientific methods, these claims lacked empirical validation through controlled, repeatable experimentation—an essential pillar of science.
This problem persists today, prompting experts to call for stricter standards on what qualifies as “reasonable medical certainty.” The consequences extend beyond academic debate—lives and families are at stake when medical testimony is accepted without rigorous scrutiny.
A prime example is Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS). For years, a triad of symptoms—subdural hemorrhaging, retinal hemorrhaging, and brain swelling—was considered definitive proof of abuse. Courts convicted countless caregivers based on expert testimony claiming these injuries could result only from violent shaking. However, later research revealed that other medical conditions, including birth trauma and genetic disorders, could mimic SBS symptoms. As a result, courts have begun re-evaluating cases where SBS was the primary evidence.
This is why having an experienced Tampa attorney like Rocky Brancato is crucial in child abuse cases. Attorneys well-versed in the Daubert standard—which governs the admissibility of expert testimony—can effectively challenge non-scientific opinions masquerading as fact. By scrutinizing the methodology behind CPT testimony, a skilled defense lawyer can expose unreliable or untested medical theories, ensuring only scientifically valid evidence is presented in court. Without a strong legal advocate, defendants risk being convicted based on speculation rather than sound science.
When law enforcement responds to allegations of abuse in a household with both a male and female parent, the focus almost always turns to the male. This automatic assumption is a prime example of implicit bias in action—our brains take mental shortcuts based on deep-seated stereotypes that portray men as inherently violent. However, these assumptions are not grounded in science or reality.
Research challenges the stereotype that men are the primary perpetrators of abuse. One study found that women are more likely to be the perpetrators of child physical abuse. This is not to suggest that one gender is more likely to abuse than the other, but rather to highlight that abuse is a human issue, not necessarily a gendered one. Despite this, bias against men in abuse allegations persists, leading to unfair investigations, legal battles, and life-altering consequences for the accused.
Wrongful accusations of child abuse based on gender stereotypes can be devastating. A false claim can destroy reputations, derail careers, and sever family bonds, often leaving the accused with little recourse. This is why strong legal advocacy is essential.
Tampa attorney Rocky Brancato is committed to exposing the truth rather than relying on societal assumptions. He understands the importance of looking beyond stereotypes to examine the facts of each case. With a meticulous and aggressive approach, he ensures that evidence—not bias—drives the legal process. If you or a loved one is facing false allegations of child abuse, you need an attorney who will fight for justice.
At The Brancato Law Firm, we stand by those falsely accused, ensuring that every case is approached with fairness, diligence, and a relentless pursuit of the truth. Contact us today to discuss your case and protect your rights.
At The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we understand that being accused of a child abuse-related offense can be overwhelming and life-altering. These cases are often emotionally charged, and the consequences of a conviction can be severe. Our experienced legal team, led by attorney Rocky Brancato, provides skilled defense for individuals facing child abuse charges in Tampa and the surrounding areas. Below, we discuss common child abuse charges in Florida and potential legal defenses.
This charge applies when a person:
Potential Defenses:
A person may be charged if they fail to provide necessary financial support for their child.
Potential Defenses:
Defined as intentional infliction of physical or mental injury upon a child, or an intentional act that could reasonably be expected to cause harm.
Potential Defenses:
This charge applies when a person causes, encourages, or contributes to a child becoming delinquent or dependent.
Potential Defenses:
Occurs when a caregiver fails to provide necessary care, supervision, or services, leading to serious harm.
Potential Defenses:
A lesser form of child neglect where harm does not reach the level of serious injury.
Potential Defenses:
This charge applies when a child under the age of six is left unattended in a vehicle for more than 15 minutes or in a situation posing risk.
Potential Defenses:
Certain individuals, such as teachers or medical professionals, are legally required to report suspected child abuse. Failure to do so can result in criminal charges.
Potential Defenses:
Take Action Now – Contact the Brancato Law Firm, P.A. for Aggressive Defense Against Child Abuse Allegations in Tampa, Tampa Bay & Hillsborough County
If you are facing child abuse allegations in Tampa, Tampa Bay, or Hillsborough County, don’t delay in securing the legal protection you deserve. Life as you know it may depend on whether you make one simple call. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., led by Rocky Brancato, offers experienced and aggressive defense strategies to protect your rights and your future. With over 25 years of experience, Rocky Brancato has a proven track record of success in handling criminal defense cases throughout the Tampa Bay area.
Whether you are in Tampa, Hillsborough County, or surrounding areas, you need a skilled attorney to ensure your case is handled with the utmost care and attention to detail. The consequences of child abuse charges can be life-altering, and securing experienced legal counsel as soon as possible is crucial.
Call now: 813-592-8981
Let Rocky Brancato and The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. fight for your rights and provide you with the aggressive defense you need to navigate these difficult charges in Tampa Bay and beyond.