Vindictive sentencing occurs when a judge imposes a harsher sentence as a form of retaliation—often in response to a defendant’s decision to reject a plea offer or exercise their right to a trial. In Florida, this practice is not only unjust, but it is also illegal. Fortunately, Florida courts have established certain tests and safeguards to protect defendants from this type of unfair treatment. The best defense against vindictive sentencing is having an experienced Tampa criminal defense attorney like Rocky Brancato of the Brancato Law Firm, P.A. in your corner.
In this blog post, we’ll explore the key principles surrounding vindictive sentencing and how you can protect yourself if you suspect it may be occurring in your case.
Florida courts use the “totality of the circumstances” test to assess instances of potential vindictive sentencing. This test, outlined in Wilson v. State 845 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 2003), draws on earlier rulings, including State v. Warner, 762 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2000). In these cases, the Florida Supreme Court emphasized fairness in sentencing and established a framework for evaluating whether a harsher sentence was imposed in retaliation for a defendant’s choice to go to trial instead of accepting a plea.
Here are some factors the court will consider when evaluating your case:
If you believe you’ve been subjected to vindictive sentencing, it’s important to file a timely appeal—usually within 30 days of your sentencing. On appeal, the court will review the following factors as part of the totality of the circumstances:
A presumption of vindictiveness arises when there is a reasonable likelihood that the increase in sentence is the product of actual vindictiveness by the judge. Cambridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). If there is a presumption of judicial vindictiveness, the appropriate remedy is resentencing before a different judge. In Wilson v. State, the appellate court held that if a previous sentence is found to be retaliatory, it should be vacated and a new sentence should be imposed by a different judge. This helps ensure that you are not unfairly penalized due to perceived bias or retribution from the original sentencing judge.
Having a skilled criminal defense attorney can significantly reduce the risk of vindictive sentencing. Attorney Rocky Brancato of the Brancato Law Firm, P.A. has extensive experience in protecting clients from unfair sentences. Here are some of the strategies he may employ to avoid a vindictive sentence:
It’s important to note that Florida law allows a judge to consider a defendant’s guilty plea as a factor when determining the sentence, as seen in Gallucci v. State, 371 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). However, judges cannot penalize defendants simply for exercising their right to go to trial, as this would violate the principle of fairness and due process. While some judges may impose a higher sentence if you reject a plea offer, this practice, known as the “trial tax,” is illegal and subject to challenge.
If you suspect that vindictive sentencing is at play in your case, don’t hesitate to reach out to the Brancato Law Firm, P.A. Our experienced team, led by Tampa Attorney Rocky Brancato, is dedicated to protecting your rights and ensuring you receive fair and just treatment throughout the legal process.
We can help you challenge a vindictive sentence and ensure that you are not unfairly punished for exercising your constitutional rights. Call us today at 813-727-7159 to schedule your free consultation and learn how we can help you reclaim your life.
At the Brancato Law Firm, P.A., we are committed to fighting for your rights and standing by your side every step of the way.